2016 Postmortem

Arkana

(24,347 posts)

88. Because Julian Assange is a garbage human being and a rapist.

Reply to DanTex (Original post)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:05 AM

Jul 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why does the "hacker left" (wikileaks, anonymous, etc.) want Trump to be president? [View all] DanTex Jul 2016 OP

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #1

The DNC didn't break any rules. Why are you trying to re-litigate the primary? DanTex Jul 2016 #2

So all these news stories I'm reading in the main stream press are lies? think Jul 2016 #3

No, just your spin on them. DanTex Jul 2016 #4

Released Emails Suggest the D.N.C. Derided the Sanders Campaign think Jul 2016 #5

Funny, the phrase "breaking the rules" appears nowhere in the article. DanTex Jul 2016 #8

Section 4, Article Five of the DNC Charter Bylaws: Triana Jul 2016 #45

I don't see the rule violations. And I don't see the point in re-litigating the primary. DanTex Jul 2016 #56

You claimed there were none. There are. Reading the emails leaked and the bylaws, there clearly are. Triana Jul 2016 #62

I said the NYT article didn't mention rules. And I was right. DanTex Jul 2016 #66

I don't understand these conspiracy theorists TeacherB87 Jul 2016 #68

This message was self-deleted by its author Triana Jul 2016 #70

DNC ByLaws are not a "conspiracy". They really exist. I assume for a reason. Triana Jul 2016 #71

You inferred that because the NYT article didn't mention rules, none were broken/existed/violated Triana Jul 2016 #69

I stated that the NYT article didn't mention the rules, contrary to what DanTex Jul 2016 #73

Right! TeacherB87 Jul 2016 #84

The fact that you're eating them without much discernment is more telling than a poliitical uponit7771 Jul 2016 #10

I can read them quite clearly. Thank you... think Jul 2016 #11

I can read the dates clearly too... she had a lock after march the rest of the primary was bullshit uponit7771 Jul 2016 #12

Bull fuckin shit, that's standard position of both parties when one candidate has a statistical lock uponit7771 Jul 2016 #6

Good luck all in... think Jul 2016 #9

Why did Assange never release dirt on Russia? Why did Snowden end up in Russia? KittyWampus Jul 2016 #7

Precisely. MADem Jul 2016 #20

Oh My Dog! hueymahl Jul 2016 #28

Suit yourself. I guess he was in the Russian consulate having birthday cake by complete accident, MADem Jul 2016 #49

Thanks for the links hueymahl Jul 2016 #53

Josh Marshall at TPM charlyvi Jul 2016 #89

And btw, Snowden leaked three years after the Russian spy ring was exposed... KittyWampus Jul 2016 #64

Perhaps because some of them get funding from Russia? And Putin knows a weak nitwit when he sees MADem Jul 2016 #13

If Assange were teaming with Putin that would explain it. DanTex Jul 2016 #15

It's his dream--and he isn't stupid, he knows that it is possible to get Trump to say ANYTHING MADem Jul 2016 #22

They want anarchy rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #14

Boredom? randome Jul 2016 #16

Some people just want to watch the world burn nt MrScorpio Jul 2016 #17

It's a two-edged sword. MineralMan Jul 2016 #18

Very thoughtful commentary. MADem Jul 2016 #23

Thanks. MineralMan Jul 2016 #24

That poor thing could use some of Trump's QT man-tan lotion!!!! MADem Jul 2016 #27

Actually, I think the go-to beast ins the howler monkey... JHB Jul 2016 #83

K&R if possible, Thank you for writing that. TexasProgresive Jul 2016 #79

Wikileaks is an affiliate of Putin's intelligence agencies nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #19

What you said. wildeyed Jul 2016 #51

Because they are REALLY the "Hacker EXTREME Right" eom MohRokTah Jul 2016 #21

DING! DING! DING! DING! baldguy Jul 2016 #86

Another attack the left as being trump supporters thread. hobbit709 Jul 2016 #25

When somebody is being a Trump supporter, it's perfectly valid to call them out on it. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #26

sorry, but NONE of the hackers I know have any use for Trump. hobbit709 Jul 2016 #29

OFFS!!!!! MohRokTah Jul 2016 #30

So are blanket statements like yours. hobbit709 Jul 2016 #33

The Hacker Right is bought and paid for by Putin. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #35

you have actual proof of that? hobbit709 Jul 2016 #40

Flag on the play... MohRokTah Jul 2016 #44

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #46

Where do you get they support Trump?? hueymahl Jul 2016 #31

I get that they support Trump because everything they do is in support of Trump. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #32

Where is the evidence they support Putin or are paid by his minions? hueymahl Jul 2016 #37

Who gave them the 20,000 DNC emails? eom MohRokTah Jul 2016 #39

I don't know. Do you? NT hueymahl Jul 2016 #42

The Kremlin gave Wikileaks those emails. eom MohRokTah Jul 2016 #43

Respectfully, how do you know? hueymahl Jul 2016 #54

It was in the national news a few weeks ago. enchantedlearner Jul 2016 #87

Why go after Dems? Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #48

It's easy to see everything through a partisan lense hueymahl Jul 2016 #50

But they never expose the hypocrisy on the right Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #85

Not the "left", the "hacker left". Meaning people like Assange. DanTex Jul 2016 #57

A fair portion of the "hacker left" is, many believe, the Putinesque Right DISGUISED as the left. MADem Jul 2016 #61

They are the vanguard of the "tear it all down" contingent. They expect to be there Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #34

You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs Iliyah Jul 2016 #55

And, those broken shells make such good fertilizer for the "Garden of Eden" that's sure to ensue. Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #58

because there is no one you hate more qazplm Jul 2016 #36

It's very creepy ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #38

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #41

I have no idea why the crazy far left wants to elect fascist Republicans. Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #47

Because they are NOT who you think they are or FOR what you think they are for. nt glennward Jul 2016 #52

The "hacker left" is more populist and anti-elitest than supportive of the Democratic establishment Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #59

Of course they don't support the Democratic establishment, they are hackers. DanTex Jul 2016 #60

They don't support Trump. They oppose the establishment. Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #63

I don't see them going after Trump the way they go after Dems. DanTex Jul 2016 #67

When there was a Bush administration, the "hacker left" universally opposed it. In the Republican Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #72

The Dem party is more establishment then Trump? kcr Jul 2016 #74

But they didn't go after Jeb or Rubio or Kasich. DanTex Jul 2016 #75

What gave you the indication that they are left or right? davidn3600 Jul 2016 #65

Maybe they aren't. "Hacker left" may not be the right term. DanTex Jul 2016 #76

when do we get the great kkk unmasking? mopinko Jul 2016 #77

Because it is really Russian Intelligence services trying to get Trump elected UCmeNdc Jul 2016 #78

Fuck Putin and his useful idiots at Wikileaks. nt SunSeeker Jul 2016 #80

The assumption is that it is a hacker "left". The DNC server was hacked by russsians. AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #81

The obvious answer would seem to be that they are not progressives. yardwork Jul 2016 #82

Because Julian Assange is a garbage human being and a rapist. Arkana Jul 2016 #88