Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,265 posts)
14. What I tweeted to Carol Costello at CNN:
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 10:53 AM
Aug 2016
NO ONE remembers early intel coming in from Benghazi WHILE Muslim world was on fire over that offensive film? CONTEXT! NOT "lie"!

It's just a damn shame. Doesn't anybody remember that film? It was deliberately meant to be provocative and offensive to Islam and released to stir shit up. As I recall, it seemed as though the entire Arab world was enflamed. There was a HUGE uproar. There were protests, angry crowds, fires and civil unrest in the streets, all over the Middle East.

And in those situations, intel from those areas is spotty, unconfirmed, and it takes awhile to get to the bottom of things. Seems to me, anyway, that it was an easy connection to make - that Benghazi was another episode of the intense and violent reaction to that film. Seems like a no-brainer to me. Given what else was going on all over that region, as a result of that film, seems like a reasonable assumption to make. And when there's tremendous widespread civil disruption like that, it takes awhile to sort through the rumors and bits of intel and whatever information can be confirmed or discounted. It takes awhile to get to the bottom of things and find out the truth. So to claim that because Hillary didn't have all the confirmed, vetted intel to make an informed opinion about what had happened and what set it off, that means she lied? WTF? Or is this just another situation in which Hillary must not ever be given the benefit of the doubt?

Am I crazy? Am I remembering incorrectly? 'Cause that's what I remember from watching that coverage. The whole Arab world was up in arms. People were beyond outraged. I think I remember Cairo being one of the cities that was literally in flames. I mean - it was pretty damn vivid television. And I remember thinking that as I watched it. Why would it be unreasonable, in the few days immediately after the Benghazi attack (when I believe she meet with the families), to assume that this stemmed from more outrage about that horrible anti-Islam propaganda film? Why does that get turned into "she LIED!"? (Well, never mind, I KNOW the answer to that one.)
K&R! stonecutter357 Aug 2016 #1
KNR Lucinda Aug 2016 #2
Hillary has class. librarylu Aug 2016 #3
Trump Saviolo Aug 2016 #8
Hillary has addressed that issue IronLionZion Aug 2016 #4
...at the most basic of citizen and humanitarian duties. Ilsa Aug 2016 #6
May be a quibble matt819 Aug 2016 #5
Very dishonest characterization. She NEVER "attacked" her. Hortensis Aug 2016 #7
That was the OP's point. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 #12
Yes, very sorry, Glennward. I leaped before I finished reading. Hortensis Aug 2016 #15
Is she Sean's mom or step mom? DURHAM D Aug 2016 #9
great analogy! treestar Aug 2016 #10
A friend of mine tried to conflate the two. calimary Aug 2016 #11
I had the thought that her son treestar Aug 2016 #13
What I tweeted to Carol Costello at CNN: calimary Aug 2016 #14
Hillary's not an insecure narcissist... Beartracks Aug 2016 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Remember when Hillary att...»Reply #14