2016 Postmortem

Cary

(11,746 posts)

35. Curiosity is a good thing.

Fri Jul 6, 2012, 05:37 PM

Jul 2012

You're doing something here that's commonly referred to as projection. I assure you that I suffer from no such "touchy-feely" thing, whatever that is supposed to be. I merely cited your errors because I favor the truth.

Clearly you cannot own up to your own deficiencies so you are employing this psychological defense mechanism, subconsciously denying your own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, and ascribing them instead to me.

I again implore you to take advantage of your curiosity and to use it as incentive to explore these deficiencies of yours. It will make you a better person.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Impeach Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia [View all] Cary Jul 2012 OP

Great article if only for the history it teaches. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #1

kick! hedgehog Jul 2012 #2

And what makes you think the DINOs... gregoire Jul 2012 #3

This is not the time to do it, we must look forward, not back. bahrbearian Jul 2012 #6

Hear! Hear! Let's not rock the boat! Raster Jul 2012 #13

He should have been impeached years ago Prophet 451 Jul 2012 #4

Him and Thomas, and if you have the liberal justices doing what they did Cosmocat Jul 2012 #21

I found a pretty good document on Impeachment. My doubt is getting Congress to teddy51 Jul 2012 #5

Was Chase impeached? No, the Senate acquited him. Then on what basis should Scalia be impeached? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #7

Technically yes. The House impeaches and the Senate serves as the jury. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #9

20 years of increasing corruption Doctor_J Jul 2012 #22

Fat chance. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #8

Dom't forget that Chase was impeached... VPStoltz Jul 2012 #10

The Senate acquitted him. Not Marshall. onenote Jul 2012 #17

Impeach him for excercising his own first amendment rights? I dont think so. cstanleytech Jul 2012 #11

Not Scalia? Then how about the husband of the lobbyist Virginia Thomas? You know, the one who AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #23

Now Thomas is a different story and imo he does deserve to be impeached. nt cstanleytech Jul 2012 #27

Interesting responses but consider that impeachment is a political move, not a criminal prosecution Cary Jul 2012 #12

It would actually be easier to ban the GOP than to remove a justice BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #14

If you were Scalia how would you like it if there was a vibrant movement advocating for Cary Jul 2012 #15

Did you not read my post? BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #16

I have yet to meet a judge who wouldn't care. Cary Jul 2012 #18

Then Kagan and Sotomayor are similarly affected by Rethug criticisms of impeachment BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #19

My credentials are solid and not only obtainable, but obtained. Cary Jul 2012 #20

Obscurity is relative BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #30

You were done before you started. n/t Cary Jul 2012 #31

Curious about something BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #34

Curiosity is a good thing. Cary Jul 2012 #35

Getting a vibrant movement to impeach Scalia is unlikely. Banning the GOP is even less likely. onenote Jul 2012 #26

So you're saying that because I post ideas here it follows that I don't live in the real world? Cary Jul 2012 #29

"Democrats and other socialist parties"? dpibel Jul 2012 #28

ROTFLMAO! Cary Jul 2012 #32

Define "vibrant movement" onenote Jul 2012 #25

I don't think that's where you missed my point. Cary Jul 2012 #33

The chance of the current House impeaching Scalia is really close to zero. stevenleser Jul 2012 #24