Democratic Primaries

Quixote1818

(28,936 posts)

19. LOL. I knew this one would get people riled up.

Tue Oct 22, 2019, 07:41 PM

Oct 2019

I personally don't think Gabbard has ANY plans to disrupt anything and please bring this post to my attention and shove it down my throat if she does run 3rd party. Sure she lines up with Russia on like one or two foreign policy issues putting her at odds with many Dems which has possibly caused Russia to latch onto her and put a few Russian bots out to help her campaign which was going no place until Hillary shined a red hot spotlight on her, but that is as far as it goes. Anything else is everyone imaginations going wild. This goes back to Gabbard being a Maverick with the DNC when she didn't like the good old boy networking going on. Just as they said on ABC, news twitter is filled with this conspiracy stuff but it doesn't line up with the current evidence. Even Malcolm Nance who would know, has said she isn't a Russian asset. Gabbard likes the more left wing part of the party and she will be backing any democratic nominee. As for going on Fox News? Lots of Dems have done that over the years from Wes Clark to Pet. It gets her exposure and raises her profile.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

VOX: The Hillary Clinton-Tulsi Gabbard feud, explained [View all] Quixote1818 Oct 2019 OP

When Hillary Clinton speaks, Turin_C3PO Oct 2019 #1

She was first right about the right-wing conspiracies that were after Bill in the 1990s LisaM Oct 2019 #8

Agree 1000% Perseus Oct 2019 #9

She was the most honest of any 2016 candidate, yet portrayed as a corrupt liar. betsuni Oct 2019 #18

The NYT has now admitted to misquoting Hillary. She didn't say Russians... brush Oct 2019 #33

Meh (never used that word before) - it's not a feud. Hillary Clinton made her comment and moved on.. George II Oct 2019 #2

Should, yes. redqueen Oct 2019 #4

+1000 ismnotwasm Oct 2019 #5

Instead gabbard went paronoid and ballistic and RAN Cha Oct 2019 #6

BULL.. Zack hasn't been paying attention.. Hillary Cha Oct 2019 #3

Zach Beauchamp is a Russia Influence denier kcr Oct 2019 #10

OMG! Thanks for telling me that, kcr.. Cha Oct 2019 #12

No problem. Your comment about his attention span kcr Oct 2019 #15

Thank you! His "... Hillary out of political obscurity.. " Cha Oct 2019 #16

I guess that goes for all the mainstream media then? Quixote1818 Oct 2019 #21

Got any links? kcr Oct 2019 #30

That's good to hear. BigmanPigman Oct 2019 #11

It's amazing to know, BP! Cha Oct 2019 #14

Kao Kahele is going to be a wonderful Congressman for your District Cha! Pachamama Oct 2019 #28

Isn't it, though, Pachamama! Cha Oct 2019 #29

Not a "feud" StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #7

Ikr! "And Hillary Clinton is not, never had been, and never will be on "political obscurity." Cha Oct 2019 #13

For me there were at least three red flags in the first paragraph. 2naSalit Oct 2019 #17

Right, 2naSalit.. there is a big "Feud" in TG's Cha Oct 2019 #23

Ding Ding Ding jpak Oct 2019 #24

This! BlueMTexpat Oct 2019 #26

LOL. I knew this one would get people riled up. Quixote1818 Oct 2019 #19

Gabbard has a problematic background ismnotwasm Oct 2019 #20

Riled up by the truth. Quixote1818 Oct 2019 #22

Tulsi was the one who BlueMTexpat Oct 2019 #27

Clinton didn't say that Gabbard is a Russian asset. yardwork Oct 2019 #32

This story is based on a misquote of Hillary by the NYT Skidmore Oct 2019 #25

"Emerged from political obscurity?" The first sentence is laughable. yardwork Oct 2019 #31