Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
6. Oh Please...did you read their methods...someone has their finger on the scale...a Warren
Thu Oct 24, 2019, 08:28 AM
Oct 2019

supporter trying to get her real momentum. Read about their method particularly about how they got the sample ...it was invitation only...

"This report contains the results of a Civiqs survey of 598 likely Democratic Caucus attendees in Iowa from
October 18-22, 2019. The survey was conducted online, among selected members of the Civiqs research
panel. Sampled individuals were emailed by Civiqs and responded using a personalized link to the survey at
civiqs.com.
Likely Democratic Caucus attendees are respondents who answered that they would "Definitely" or
"Probably" attend the Iowa Democratic Caucuses scheduled for February 2020, in question 1, and who
identified themselves as Democrats or Independents on a previous Civiqs survey.
The order of the candidate trait questions was rotated across six versions of the questionnaire. Respondents
were randomly asked about a different candidate first, on each of the six versions.
The survey results are weighted by age, race, gender, education, party identification, and congressional
district to be representative of the population of likely Iowa Democratic Caucus attendees. Demographic
data, including self-reported party identification, was collected in previous Civiqs surveys. The general
design effect due to weighting is 1.57. The survey has a margin of error of ±5.0% at the 95% confidence level,
accounting for the design effect. All survey results in this report are reported as percentages."

The polls are the polls...but now with this sort of thing. Proving a what some believe is a truth with a falsehood...never understood that.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
I do believe in Warren and Buttigieg's surges bearsfootball516 Oct 2019 #1
In other polls Biden surged to 34%. True Blue American Oct 2019 #3
I am also waiting for the gold standard, the Des Moines Register A+ poll Celerity Oct 2019 #4
Interesting BeyondGeography Oct 2019 #2
I have not settled because True Blue American Oct 2019 #5
Oh Please...did you read their methods...someone has their finger on the scale...a Warren Demsrule86 Oct 2019 #6
I don't see the part where the poll was weighted in Warren's favor Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #9
did you read about how it was weighed...I am telling you this is a small sample size Demsrule86 Oct 2019 #10
lololol, keep on trying, because your false framing that it is a Warren supporter finger on the Celerity Oct 2019 #16
legit online polls are done via emails, its not a Drudge style, mash it till you ring up 200 votes Celerity Oct 2019 #13
Go Pete! crazytown Oct 2019 #7
Thanks for including the MOE!!! Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #8
1st+2nd Choices: EW 52%, PB 34%, BS 31%, JB 22%, AK 11%, KH 9% crazytown Oct 2019 #11
Lol boomer_wv Oct 2019 #12
Did you read how they conducted it? an invitation only poll...only those who voted a certain way Demsrule86 Oct 2019 #14
you are a broken record, your attempted 'invitation only' false frame smear has been summarily dealt Celerity Oct 2019 #17
"the polls are what the polls are" crazytown Oct 2019 #15
Lol...Is it our turn for good polls today? BeyondGeography Oct 2019 #18
All I did was post the poll, and I even said in the thread I am waiting to see the gold standard Celerity Oct 2019 #19
Sorry. See my reply #20 crazytown Oct 2019 #21
Hey - I'm not ridiculing the poll you posted. crazytown Oct 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Brand new Iowa State Univ...»Reply #6