Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DemocratSinceBirth
DemocratSinceBirth's Journal
DemocratSinceBirth's Journal
January 12, 2017
Kellyanne Conway has to be the most evil person in politics. She would make Joseph Goebbels and Julius Streicher blush...F Godwin's Law. I could easily see her as a warden at a concentration camp if it was in service to her Führer Anybody in the media who tries normalize her can piss up a rope.
Kellyanne Conway has to be the most evil person in politics.
Kellyanne Conway has to be the most evil person in politics. She would make Joseph Goebbels and Julius Streicher blush...F Godwin's Law. I could easily see her as a warden at a concentration camp if it was in service to her Führer Anybody in the media who tries normalize her can piss up a rope.
January 12, 2017
Have Herr Drumpf and Frau Conway apologized to CNN for lying about their reporting?
January 12, 2017
Is MSNBC becoming FOX LITE?
January 12, 2017

Even if Pee-gate isnt true, Donald Trump is stuck with it.

Even if Pee-gate isnt true, Donald Trump is stuck with it.You may have heard that some controversial documents were leaked last night by BuzzFeed, the juiciest of which alleges that Trump likes to get peed on. Or likes to pee on women. Something with piss.
The actual report, which is unconfirmed, states that Trump hired prostitutes in Russia to perform a golden showers urination show for him, which Russian authorities planned to use as compromising material to blackmail him. The details have been the subject of some amused debate on Twitterwas Trump actually showered upon? or did he just watch? is urine sterile?but they dont really matter. What matters is that the connection between Trump and kinky pee is now seared into our collective consciousness.
The scandal tracks closely with this famous would you rather conundrum: Would you rather have sex with a goat but have nobody know, or not and have everyone think you did? David Cameron is a real-life exemplar of this query. An unsubstantiated allegation was published last year alleging that he had stuck his nob in a pigs gob. The chances that Trump or Cameron actually did these salacious acts are small, but that doesnt change the fact that everyone cant stop seeing and talking about it.
Trump did his best to discredit the report, signaling in a rare use of all-caps that this was a Drudge sirenlevel offense: FAKE NEWS - A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT! Trumps Twitter feed is fake news incarnate, but (and it pains me to say it) he was not wrong to label Pee-gate a kind of fake news. The paradox is that in the era of fake news, the term fake news has lost any real meaning, in no small part due to Trump. News is as partisan as anything else, a blunt weapon to be used against political opponents. And whether the story is true or not, Trump has to live with it.
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/139806/even-pee-gate-isnt-true-donald-trump-stuck-it[
The actual report, which is unconfirmed, states that Trump hired prostitutes in Russia to perform a golden showers urination show for him, which Russian authorities planned to use as compromising material to blackmail him. The details have been the subject of some amused debate on Twitterwas Trump actually showered upon? or did he just watch? is urine sterile?but they dont really matter. What matters is that the connection between Trump and kinky pee is now seared into our collective consciousness.
The scandal tracks closely with this famous would you rather conundrum: Would you rather have sex with a goat but have nobody know, or not and have everyone think you did? David Cameron is a real-life exemplar of this query. An unsubstantiated allegation was published last year alleging that he had stuck his nob in a pigs gob. The chances that Trump or Cameron actually did these salacious acts are small, but that doesnt change the fact that everyone cant stop seeing and talking about it.
Trump did his best to discredit the report, signaling in a rare use of all-caps that this was a Drudge sirenlevel offense: FAKE NEWS - A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT! Trumps Twitter feed is fake news incarnate, but (and it pains me to say it) he was not wrong to label Pee-gate a kind of fake news. The paradox is that in the era of fake news, the term fake news has lost any real meaning, in no small part due to Trump. News is as partisan as anything else, a blunt weapon to be used against political opponents. And whether the story is true or not, Trump has to live with it.
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/139806/even-pee-gate-isnt-true-donald-trump-stuck-it[
January 11, 2017
Rex Tillerson can't pass muster with Marco Rubio but he can pass muster with Chris Coons.
SMH
January 11, 2017
I call em like I see em. Thank you, Senator Rubio, for asking Rex Tillerson about Rodrigo Duterte
He is a thug !!!
January 11, 2017
I proudly stand with Cory Booker in his opposition to Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III

January 11, 2017
It's on. Drumpf presser thread
http://variety.com/2017/digital/news/trump-press-conference-live-stream-watch-online-1201957955/
January 11, 2017
The Guardian: source for 35 page "dossier" is "consistently reliable, meticulous,
and well informed."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts?CMP=share_btn_tw
Senator John McCain passed documents to the FBI director, James Comey, last month alleging secret contacts between the Trump campaign and Moscow and that Russian intelligence had personally compromising material on the president-elect himself.
The material, which has been seen by the Guardian, is a series of reports on Trumps relationship with Moscow. They were drawn up by a former western counter-intelligence official, now working as a private consultant.
The Guardian has not been able to confirm the veracity of the documents contents, and the Trump team has consistently denied any hidden contacts with the Russian government.
SNIP
An official in the US administration who spoke to the Guardian described the source who wrote the intelligence report as consistently reliable, meticulous and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.
Some of the reports which are dated from 20 June to 20 October last year also proved to be prescient, predicting events that happened after they were sent.
We will learn soon enough if these documents are what they seem to be. It is in the Deplorables interest that they aren't
Did Deplorables at 4Chan create the Peepeegate documents ?
It is the Trump trolls at 4Chan that are saying that one of them created the Peepeegate documents. Cui bono? They are, of course, saying that to discredit the story as apocryphal. If the documents were forgeries they were damn good forgeries because they fooled various intelligence agencies, United States senators, and the president.
There is an interesting news story from the Guardian about the authenticity of the documents:
The Guardian: source for 35 page "dossier" is "consistently reliable, meticulous,
and well informed."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts?CMP=share_btn_tw
Senator John McCain passed documents to the FBI director, James Comey, last month alleging secret contacts between the Trump campaign and Moscow and that Russian intelligence had personally compromising material on the president-elect himself.
The material, which has been seen by the Guardian, is a series of reports on Trumps relationship with Moscow. They were drawn up by a former western counter-intelligence official, now working as a private consultant.
The Guardian has not been able to confirm the veracity of the documents contents, and the Trump team has consistently denied any hidden contacts with the Russian government.
SNIP
An official in the US administration who spoke to the Guardian described the source who wrote the intelligence report as consistently reliable, meticulous and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.
Some of the reports which are dated from 20 June to 20 October last year also proved to be prescient, predicting events that happened after they were sent.
We will learn soon enough if these documents are what they seem to be. It is in the Deplorables interest that they aren't
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayMember since: Sat Jul 12, 2003, 12:35 PM
Number of posts: 100,932